Every requirement on the programme linked to the need it came from, the system it is allocated to, the person who owns it and the evidence that closes it. Reqi keeps that chain live as the design changes, so traceability is something you read off the register before a review rather than something you rebuild in a spreadsheet the night before.
A requirement is never a row on its own. Each one carries the links that let you answer the questions a reviewer, a regulator or a supplier will ask: where it came from, which system owns it, who signed it off and what evidence closed it.
The flow-down alongside is the shape of it. A top-level requirement is derived level by level into subsystem and component requirements, each one linked to its parent, with the status of every link in view.
A business or stakeholder requirement flows down into system, subsystem and component requirements. Each derived requirement points back to its parent, so nothing is orphaned and every allocation is justified.
Every requirement is allocated to its place in the system breakdown structure. You can see what each subsystem owes, and which requirements have no home yet.
Designers, reviewers and verifiers are named per system. The person who designs a requirement is rarely the one who signs it off, and the register records who did what.
Acceptance criteria are defined against each requirement and the verification evidence is recorded with it, so closure is traceable to a document, a test or an inspection rather than to a tick in a cell.
Risk sits beside the requirement it affects. The ACD register tracks assumptions, constraints and dependencies through the lifecycle with a risk level and an action plan.
Each requirement is tagged with its lifecycle phase, so a concept-phase requirement and a commissioning-phase requirement can be filtered, reported and verified at the right time.
Reqi is built on INCOSE systems engineering principles and tracks requirements through the whole V-model lifecycle. Forward traceability runs from a stakeholder need down through system and subsystem requirements to the component that satisfies it. Backward traceability runs from a test result or an inspection back up to the requirement it verifies and the need that justified it.
When a requirement changes, the chain shows what else changes with it. When a supplier asks why a requirement exists, the parent is one click away. The method behind this is set out in our requirements engineering framework; if you want the underlying ideas first, read what a traceability matrix is and how the V-model works.
The hard part of traceability on a real programme is not the links. It is that the people who hold the evidence work for different organisations. Reqi gives the client, the contractor and every supplier one shared register with unlimited users, so a supplier records its evidence against the requirement itself rather than emailing a spreadsheet that someone then has to merge.
How the roles and the review states work is covered on the supply chain requirements management page.
Assumptions, constraints and dependencies are tracked throughout the project lifecycle, each with a risk level and an action plan, and each attached to the requirements it affects. Safety requirements sit in the same register, from HAZOP and FMEA outputs through to verification evidence and safety case closure. There is a fuller description on the safety hazard management page, and a guide to the ACD register in the articles.
Flowing a high-level requirement down through a deep system hierarchy by hand is where traceability usually breaks. REX, the AI assistant inside Reqi, derives subsystem and component sub-requirements from each parent and proposes the allocation level by level, as in the flow-down at the top of this page, so the chain is built as a proposal for you to review rather than left as a job for later. It also reads a PDF contract or specification and extracts a structured requirement list, so the top of the chain is populated from the source document instead of being retyped. The detail is on AI and MCP in systems engineering, and you can score a requirement in REX right now without signing up.
$190 per month, plus GST
Per project, for one to five projects. Unlimited users on every plan, so every organisation in the chain can be in the register.
A single project is free for three months, up to 500 requirements, with unlimited users and no card. Full detail on the pricing page.
It produces what a traceability matrix is for, without you maintaining the matrix. Every requirement holds its parent, its derived requirements, its system allocation, its owner and its evidence, and the register can be viewed as a table, a tree or a network diagram and exported to Excel when a matrix is what the reviewer wants.
Yes. Reqi imports requirements from Excel, CSV and Word files, and REX extracts a structured requirement list from a PDF. Parent links and system allocations are then set in Reqi, with REX able to propose them for review.
Yes. Acceptance criteria are defined per requirement and the verification evidence is recorded against it, so a requirement is closed by a traceable document, test or inspection.
Yes. Safety requirements are managed in the same register as everything else, alongside assumptions, constraints and dependencies, from hazard identification through to safety case closure. See safety hazard management.
$190 per month plus GST per project, with unlimited users. A single project is free for three months with up to 500 requirements.
Three months free, 500 requirements, unlimited users, no card. Or score a requirement in REX right now without signing up.
Get started free Book a demo