Skip to content
logo-sm

Reqi

Reqi Systems Engineering Articles

  • Reqi
  • Latest
  • Terms
  • Systems Engineering
    • Human Factors
    • Safety and Hazards
  • Requirements
  • MBSE
  • Digital Twins
  • AI and Machine learning
  • Project Management
    • Sustainability
  • Top Courses List
  • Subscribe
Mastering INCOSE Requirements Quality

INCOSE Requirements Quality: The Complete 42-Rule Guide to Writing Excellent Requirements for Systems Engineers

Posted on 31 July 202531 July 2025 By Mike Wayne No Comments on INCOSE Requirements Quality: The Complete 42-Rule Guide to Writing Excellent Requirements for Systems Engineers

Well-written requirements form the foundation of successful systems engineering projects. Poor requirements lead to cost overruns, schedule delays, and systems that fail to meet stakeholder needs. This comprehensive guide presents the 42 rules for writing excellent requirements, based on the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Guide to Writing Requirements. These rules represent the systematic approach to Requirements Quality Engineering – the disciplined process of ensuring requirements possess the characteristics necessary for successful system development. The rules are organized into 12 categories that systematically address every aspect of requirement quality, from basic accuracy to complex organizational structures.

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
    • What is Requirements Quality Engineering?
    • The 15 Essential Characteristics of Quality Requirements
    • AI Support for Requirements Quality Engineering
  • 1. Accuracy Rules (R1-R9): Building the Foundation
    • R1 – Structured Statements
    • R2 – Active Voice
    • R3 – Appropriate Subject-Verb
    • R4 – Defined Terms
    • R5 – Definite Articles
    • R6 – Common Units of Measure
    • R7 – Vague Terms
    • R8 – Escape Clauses
    • R9 – Open-Ended Clauses
  • 2. Concision Rules (R10-R11): Eliminating Waste
    • R10 – Superfluous Infinitives
    • R11 – Separate Clauses
  • 3. Non-Ambiguity Rules (R12-R17): Crystal Clear Communication
    • R12 – Correct Grammar
    • R13 – Correct Spelling
    • R14 – Correct Punctuation
    • R15 – Logical Expressions
    • R16 – Use of “Not”
    • R17 – Use of Oblique Symbol
  • 4. Singularity Rules (R18-R23): One Thought, One Requirement
    • R18 – Single Thought Sentence
    • R19 – Combinators
    • R20 – Purpose Phrases
    • R21 – Parentheses
    • R22 – Enumeration
    • R23 – Supporting Diagrams
  • 5. Completeness Rules (R24-R25): Self-Contained Statements
    • R24 – Pronouns
    • R25 – Headings
  • 6. Realism Rules (R26): Achievable Targets
    • R26 – Absolutes
  • 7. Conditions Rules (R27-R28): When Requirements Apply
    • R27 – Explicit Conditions
    • R28 – Multiple Conditions
  • 8. Uniqueness Rules (R29-R30): No Duplication
    • R29 – Classification
    • R30 – Unique Expression
  • 9. Abstraction Rules (R31): Appropriate Level of Detail
    • R31 – Solution Free
  • 10. Quantifiers Rules (R32): Clear Scope
    • R32 – Universal Qualification
  • 11. Tolerance Rules (R33): Realistic Ranges
    • R33 – Range of Values
  • 12. Quantification Rules (R34-R35): Measurable Targets
    • R34 – Measurable Performance
    • R35 – Temporal Dependencies
  • 13. Uniformity of Language Rules (R36-R40): Consistent Communication
    • R36 – Consistent Terms and Units
    • R37 – Acronyms
    • R38 – Abbreviations
    • R39 – Style Guide
    • R40 – Decimal Format
  • 14. Modularity Rules (R41-R42): Organized Structure
    • R41 – Related Requirements
    • R42 – Structured Sets
  • Implementation Strategy for Requirements Quality Engineering
    • 1. Organization-Level Implementation
    • 2. Project-Level Implementation
    • 3. Tool Support
    • 4. Quality Metrics
  • Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
    • Pitfall 1: Treating Requirements as Wishes
    • Pitfall 2: Copy-Paste from Previous Projects
    • Pitfall 3: Mixing Levels of Abstraction
    • Pitfall 4: Requirements Creep During Development
  • Verification and Validation in Requirements Quality Engineering
    • Verification Planning
    • Validation Planning
  • Conclusion
  • References

Introduction

Requirements are the bridge between stakeholder needs and system implementation. They serve as the formal agreement between customers and developers, the basis for design decisions, and the criteria for verification and validation. Despite their critical importance, requirements are often poorly written, leading to misunderstandings, rework, and project failures.

What is Requirements Quality Engineering?

Requirements Quality Engineering is the systematic application of proven principles, rules, and practices to ensure that requirements possess the characteristics necessary for successful system development. This discipline goes beyond simply writing requirements – it encompasses the entire process of crafting, reviewing, organizing, and maintaining requirements that truly serve their intended purpose.

The INCOSE Requirements Working Group has developed a comprehensive framework for Requirements Quality Engineering, distilling decades of systems engineering experience into 42 specific rules. This framework represents the gold standard for professional requirements engineering practice.

Recommended Further Reading Amazon Books
Image 7
Image 8
Image 9
Image 10
Image 11

The 15 Essential Characteristics of Quality Requirements

Quality requirements possess 15 essential characteristics at two levels:

  1. Necessary – Required to satisfy a lifecycle concept, need, or higher-level requirement
  2. Appropriate – Suitable to the level of the entity to which it refers
  3. Unambiguous – Can be interpreted in only one way by all intended audiences
  4. Complete – Sufficiently describes the necessary capability without further amplification
  5. Singular – States a single capability, characteristic, constraint, or quality factor
  6. Feasible – Can be realized within entity constraints with acceptable risk
  7. Verifiable/Validatable – Structured so realization can be verified/validated
  8. Correct – Accurate representation of the source from which it was transformed
  9. Conforming – Follows approved standards and patterns
  10. Complete – Set stands alone and sufficiently describes all necessary aspects
  11. Consistent – Individual requirements don’t conflict and use homogeneous language
  12. Feasible – Set can be realized within constraints with acceptable risk
  13. Comprehensible – Clear what is expected of the entity and its relationships
  14. Able to be Validated – Possible to validate the set leads to achievement of goals
  15. Correct – Accurate representation of sources from which the set was transformed

The complete INCOSE Guide to Writing Requirements (INCOSE-TP-2010-006-04) is available at https://www.incose.org for INCOSE members and provides the authoritative source for these principles.

This guide organizes the 42 INCOSE rules into logical categories, providing systems engineers with a practical reference for implementing Requirements Quality Engineering practices that truly serve their intended purpose.

AI Support for Requirements Quality Engineering

While mastering these 42 rules is essential for systems engineers, manually applying them can be time-consuming and error-prone. Try our free Rex AI requirements writing tool at reqi.io/rex that uses advanced AI and systems engineering principles. Say goodbye to manual requirement hassles and hello to efficiency with REX, our cutting-edge AI-powered assistant. This tool uses AI and the INCOSE framework to generate new, well-formed requirements from your input, rated against the 42-Point Guide to Writing Requirements.

1. Accuracy Rules (R1-R9): Building the Foundation

Accuracy forms the bedrock of Requirements Quality Engineering. These nine rules ensure that requirements communicate their intended meaning clearly and precisely.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R1Structured StatementsNeed and requirement statements must conform to agreed patterns, resulting in well-structured complete statementsEnsure consistency, completeness, and conformance to organizational standards
R2Active VoiceUse active voice with the responsible entity clearly identified as the subjectMake clear who/what is responsible for performing the action
R3Appropriate Subject-VerbEnsure subject and verb are appropriate to the entity the statement refers toAlign requirements with correct organizational/system level
R4Defined TermsDefine all terms within an associated glossary and/or data dictionaryEliminate ambiguity through consistent terminology
R5Definite ArticlesUse “the” rather than “a” when referring to entitiesAvoid ambiguity about which specific entity is referenced
R6Common Units of MeasureUse appropriate and consistent units of measure with a common measurement systemEnsure precision and consistency in quantitative statements
R7Vague TermsAvoid vague terms like “some,” “adequate,” “reasonable”Eliminate ambiguity and ensure verifiability
R8Escape ClausesAvoid escape clauses like “where possible,” “as appropriate,” “if necessary”Prevent loopholes that could excuse non-compliance
R9Open-Ended ClausesAvoid non-specific clauses like “including but not limited to,” “etc.”Ensure completeness and prevent scope creep

R1 – Structured Statements

Objective: Ensure consistency, completeness, and conformance to organizational standards

Requirements must follow agreed-upon patterns or templates. A basic pattern might be: “When [condition], the [entity] shall [action] [object] [performance measure].” This structure forces completeness and consistency across all requirements.

Example:

  • Poor: “The system should work fast”
  • Good: “When processing user queries, the Database_System shall return search results within 2.0 ± 0.5 seconds”

R2 – Active Voice

Objective: Make clear who/what is responsible for performing the action

Active voice places the responsible entity at the beginning of the sentence, eliminating confusion about accountability.

Example:

  • Poor: “Data shall be encrypted” (Who encrypts it?)
  • Good: “The Security_Module shall encrypt all transmitted data”

R3 – Appropriate Subject-Verb

Objective: Align requirements with correct organizational/system level

The subject must match the level of the requirement set. System-level requirements should have the system as subject, not users or subsystems.

Example:

  • Poor: “The user shall enter a password” (requirement on user)
  • Good: “The Authentication_System shall prompt for password entry”

R4 – Defined Terms

Objective: Eliminate ambiguity through consistent terminology

Every technical term must be defined in a glossary or data dictionary and used consistently throughout all project artifacts.

R5 – Definite Articles

Objective: Avoid ambiguity about which specific entity is referenced

Use “the” instead of “a” to refer to specific, defined entities rather than any random instance.

R6 – Common Units of Measure

Objective: Ensure precision and consistency in quantitative statements

All measurements must use consistent units throughout the project. Mixing metric and imperial units creates confusion and potential errors.

R7 – Vague Terms

Objective: Eliminate ambiguity and ensure verifiability

Words like “adequate,” “reasonable,” “user-friendly,” and “fast” are subjective and unverifiable. Replace with specific, measurable criteria.

R8 – Escape Clauses

Objective: Prevent loopholes that could excuse non-compliance

Phrases like “where possible” or “as appropriate” give developers excuses not to implement requirements fully.

R9 – Open-Ended Clauses

Objective: Ensure completeness and prevent scope creep

Avoid “including but not limited to” and “etc.” Instead, explicitly list all required items or write separate requirements for each item.

Recommended Future Learn Short Courses
Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Image 4
Image 5
Image 6

2. Concision Rules (R10-R11): Eliminating Waste

Concise requirements are easier to understand, implement, and verify. These rules eliminate unnecessary words while preserving meaning.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R10Superfluous InfinitivesAvoid superfluous infinitives like “to be able to,” “to be capable of”Eliminate unnecessary words and ambiguity about conditions
R11Separate ClausesUse separate clauses for each condition or qualificationImprove clarity and enable proper verification

R10 – Superfluous Infinitives

Objective: Eliminate unnecessary words and ambiguity about conditions

Phrases like “shall be able to” or “shall be capable of” add no value and create ambiguity about when the capability must be demonstrated.

Example:

  • Poor: “The system shall be able to process 1000 transactions per hour”
  • Good: “When in operational mode, the system shall process 1000 ± 50 transactions per hour”

R11 – Separate Clauses

Objective: Improve clarity and enable proper verification

Each condition or qualification should be in its own clause, properly structured to avoid confusion about what applies to what.

3. Non-Ambiguity Rules (R12-R17): Crystal Clear Communication

Ambiguous requirements lead to different interpretations by different stakeholders. These rules eliminate multiple possible meanings.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R12Correct GrammarUse correct grammar throughout statementsEnsure clear interpretation, especially for non-native speakers
R13Correct SpellingUse correct spelling consistentlyPrevent confusion from misspelled words
R14Correct PunctuationUse correct punctuation to avoid confusionClarify relationships between clauses
R15Logical ExpressionsUse defined conventions for logical expressions like “[X AND Y]”Make logical conditions explicit and unambiguous
R16Use of “Not”Avoid using the word “not”Enable positive, verifiable statements
R17Use of Oblique SymbolAvoid the oblique (“/”) symbolEliminate multiple possible interpretations

R12 – Correct Grammar

Objective: Ensure clear interpretation, especially for non-native speakers

Poor grammar clouds meaning and can be especially problematic in international projects where stakeholders work in second languages.

R13 – Correct Spelling

Objective: Prevent confusion from misspelled words

Spell-checkers help, but be aware of correctly spelled wrong words (e.g., “ordinance” vs. “ordnance”).

R14 – Correct Punctuation

Objective: Clarify relationships between clauses

Misplaced commas and other punctuation marks can completely change a requirement’s meaning.

R15 – Logical Expressions

Objective: Make logical conditions explicit and unambiguous

Use clear conventions like “[X AND Y]” or “[X OR Y]” instead of ambiguous natural language constructions.

R16 – Use of “Not”

Objective: Enable positive, verifiable statements

Negative requirements are often impossible to verify completely. Instead of “shall not fail,” specify positive reliability or availability requirements.

R17 – Use of Oblique Symbol

Objective: Eliminate multiple possible interpretations

The “/” symbol can mean “and,” “or,” “per,” or indicate alternatives. Use explicit language instead.

Recommended Further Reading Amazon Books
Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Image 4
Image 5
Image 6

4. Singularity Rules (R18-R23): One Thought, One Requirement

Singular requirements can be allocated, traced, and verified individually. These rules ensure each requirement addresses exactly one concern.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R18Single Thought SentenceWrite single sentences containing single thoughts with relevant sub-clausesEnable proper allocation, traceability, and verification
R19CombinatorsAvoid combinators like “and,” “or,” “then,” “unless” that join multiple clausesMaintain single-thought principle
R20Purpose PhrasesAvoid phrases indicating “purpose of” or “intent of” the requirementKeep statements concise; use rationale attributes for explanations
R21ParenthesesAvoid parentheses and brackets containing subordinate textEliminate superfluous information and potential ambiguity
R22EnumerationEnumerate sets explicitly instead of using group nounsEnable individual allocation and verification of each item
R23Supporting DiagramsWhen requirements involve complex behavior, refer to supporting diagrams, models, or ICDsClarify complex relationships that are difficult to express in text

R18 – Single Thought Sentence

Objective: Enable proper allocation, traceability, and verification

Each requirement should contain one main action with appropriate qualifying clauses. Multiple actions require multiple requirements.

Example:

  • Poor: “The system shall validate user credentials and log successful attempts and send notifications to administrators”
  • Good: Three separate requirements for validation, logging, and notification

R19 – Combinators

Objective: Maintain single-thought principle

Words like “and,” “or,” “then” often indicate multiple thoughts that should be separated into individual requirements.

R20 – Purpose Phrases

Objective: Keep statements concise; use rationale attributes for explanations

Avoid “in order to” and “so that” phrases in the requirement text. Put explanatory information in rationale attributes.

R21 – Parentheses

Objective: Eliminate superfluous information and potential ambiguity

Parenthetical information often indicates nice-to-know information that belongs in rationale, not the requirement itself.

R22 – Enumeration

Objective: Enable individual allocation and verification of each item

Instead of “The system shall manage user functions,” explicitly list each function as a separate requirement.

R23 – Supporting Diagrams

Objective: Clarify complex relationships that are difficult to express in text

For complex behaviors, reference well-defined diagrams, models, or Interface Control Documents rather than trying to capture everything in text.

5. Completeness Rules (R24-R25): Self-Contained Statements

Complete requirements stand alone without requiring external context or cross-references.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R24PronounsAvoid personal and indefinite pronounsEliminate cross-references and maintain statement independence
R25HeadingsAvoid relying on headings to support understandingEnsure statements are complete and self-contained

R24 – Pronouns

Objective: Eliminate cross-references and maintain statement independence

Avoid “it,” “they,” “this,” and “that.” Repeat nouns to ensure each requirement is self-contained, especially important when requirements are managed in databases where order may change.

R25 – Headings

Objective: Ensure statements are complete and self-contained

Requirements should not depend on section headings for meaning. Each requirement must be fully understandable in isolation.

6. Realism Rules (R26): Achievable Targets

Unrealistic requirements waste resources and create impossible verification challenges.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R26AbsolutesAvoid unachievable absolutes like “100%” or “always”Ensure feasibility and verifiability

R26 – Absolutes

Objective: Ensure feasibility and verifiability

Avoid “100%,” “always,” “never,” and “all” unless truly absolute. These typically cannot be verified with finite resources.

Example:

  • Poor: “The system shall have 100% availability”
  • Good: “The system shall have ≥99.9% availability during operational hours”

7. Conditions Rules (R27-R28): When Requirements Apply

Many requirements only apply under specific conditions. These rules ensure conditions are stated explicitly and clearly.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R27Explicit ConditionsState conditions’ applicability explicitly instead of inferring from contextEnsure completeness and verifiability
R28Multiple ConditionsExpress propositional nature of conditions explicitly for single actionsClarify when multiple conditions apply (AND vs OR)

R27 – Explicit Conditions

Objective: Ensure completeness and verifiability

State all applicable conditions directly in the requirement rather than assuming they’re understood from context.

Example:

  • Poor: “The system shall encrypt data” (When? What data?)
  • Good: “When transmitting customer records over public networks, the system shall encrypt data using AES-256”

R28 – Multiple Conditions

Objective: Clarify when multiple conditions apply (AND vs OR)

When multiple conditions trigger an action, make clear whether all conditions must be met simultaneously (AND) or any condition is sufficient (OR).

8. Uniqueness Rules (R29-R30): No Duplication

Duplicate requirements create confusion and maintenance problems when changes are needed.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R29ClassificationClassify needs and requirements by problem/system aspects they addressEnable organization, completeness checking, and conflict identification
R30Unique ExpressionExpress each need and requirement once and only onceEliminate duplication and potential conflicts

R29 – Classification

Objective: Enable organization, completeness checking, and conflict identification

Classify requirements by type (functional, performance, interface, safety, etc.) to help identify gaps, overlaps, and conflicts.

R30 – Unique Expression

Objective: Eliminate duplication and potential conflicts

Each requirement should appear exactly once in the requirements set. Similar requirements with different wording often indicate incomplete analysis or poor organization.

9. Abstraction Rules (R31): Appropriate Level of Detail

Requirements should specify what the system must do without unnecessarily constraining how it does it.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R31Solution FreeAvoid stating implementation unless there’s rationale for constraining designFocus on “what” rather than “how” to preserve design freedom

R31 – Solution Free

Objective: Focus on “what” rather than “how” to preserve design freedom

Unless there’s a compelling reason to constrain the design, requirements should state the desired outcome rather than the implementation approach.

Example:

  • Poor: “The system shall use a MySQL database”
  • Good: “The system shall store customer records with 99.9% data availability”

10. Quantifiers Rules (R32): Clear Scope

Quantifiers determine whether requirements apply to individual items or collections.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R32Universal QualificationUse “each” instead of “all,” “any,” or “both” for universal quantificationClarify whether action applies to whole set or individual elements

R32 – Universal Qualification

Objective: Clarify whether action applies to whole set or individual elements

Use “each” instead of “all,” “any,” or “both” to make clear that the requirement applies to every individual item, not the collection as a whole.

11. Tolerance Rules (R33): Realistic Ranges

Single-point specifications are rarely achievable or necessary. Appropriate tolerances enable cost-effective solutions.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R33Range of ValuesDefine quantities with appropriate value ranges for verification/validationEnable realistic verification and provide acceptable trade-space

R33 – Range of Values

Objective: Enable realistic verification and provide acceptable trade-space

Specify acceptable ranges rather than single values. Consider what variation would still meet stakeholder needs.

Example:

  • Poor: “Response time shall be 2.0 seconds”
  • Good: “Response time shall be 2.0 ± 0.3 seconds”

12. Quantification Rules (R34-R35): Measurable Targets

Quantified requirements enable objective verification and clear success criteria.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R34Measurable PerformanceProvide specific measurable performance targetsEnable objective verification
R35Temporal DependenciesDefine temporal dependencies explicitly instead of using indefinite temporal keywordsProvide specific, verifiable timing constraints

R34 – Measurable Performance

Objective: Enable objective verification

Replace subjective terms like “fast,” “user-friendly,” and “reliable” with specific, measurable criteria.

R35 – Temporal Dependencies

Objective: Provide specific, verifiable timing constraints

Replace vague temporal terms like “eventually,” “soon,” and “before” with specific time constraints.

13. Uniformity of Language Rules (R36-R40): Consistent Communication

Consistent language prevents misunderstandings and enables effective tool support.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R36Consistent Terms and UnitsUse terms and units consistently throughout all artifactsEnsure consistency across the entire system lifecycle
R37AcronymsUse acronyms consistently throughout all artifactsMaintain consistent terminology
R38AbbreviationsAvoid abbreviations unless clearly definedPrevent ambiguity from multiple meanings
R39Style GuideUse project-wide style guide for statementsEnsure organizational consistency and quality
R40Decimal FormatUse consistent format and significant digits for decimal numbersMaintain precision consistency

R36 – Consistent Terms and Units

Objective: Ensure consistency across the entire system lifecycle

Use identical terminology in requirements, design documents, test procedures, and user manuals. Maintain a project glossary and enforce its use.

R37 – Acronyms

Objective: Maintain consistent terminology

Use the same acronym consistently throughout all project artifacts. Don’t mix “GPS” and “Global Positioning System” randomly.

R38 – Abbreviations

Objective: Prevent ambiguity from multiple meanings

Avoid abbreviations unless absolutely necessary and clearly defined. Many abbreviations have multiple meanings depending on context.

R39 – Style Guide

Objective: Ensure organizational consistency and quality

Develop and follow organization-wide standards for requirement patterns, attributes, and formatting.

R40 – Decimal Format

Objective: Maintain precision consistency

Use consistent decimal notation and significant digits throughout all requirements. Don’t mix “5.0” and “5.00” randomly.

14. Modularity Rules (R41-R42): Organized Structure

Well-organized requirements are easier to understand, maintain, and verify for completeness.

Rule #NameDescriptionObjective
R41Related RequirementsGroup related needs and requirements togetherImprove organization and identify relationships
R42Structured SetsConform to defined structure/template for organizing setsEnsure systematic coverage and organization

R41 – Related Requirements

Objective: Improve organization and identify relationships

Group related requirements together by function, interface, or other logical relationships. This helps identify gaps and conflicts.

R42 – Structured Sets

Objective: Ensure systematic coverage and organization

Use consistent organizational templates that ensure all types of requirements are considered: functional, performance, interface, safety, security, etc.

Implementation Strategy for Requirements Quality Engineering

Successfully implementing Requirements Quality Engineering requires a systematic approach:

1. Organization-Level Implementation

  • Develop organizational standards based on these INCOSE rules
  • Create requirement templates and patterns
  • Establish glossaries and data dictionaries
  • Implement tool support for rule checking
  • Train personnel on Requirements Quality Engineering practices

2. Project-Level Implementation

  • Tailor organizational standards to project needs
  • Establish project-specific terminology
  • Set up automated checking where possible
  • Conduct regular requirement quality reviews
  • Link requirements to verification procedures

3. Tool Support

  • Many Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can automatically check compliance with these rules
  • Requirement management tools can enforce templates and patterns
  • Automated checking reduces manual review effort and catches errors early
  • Try our free Rex AI requirements writing tool at reqi.io/rex for immediate assistance with applying these INCOSE principles

4. Quality Metrics

Track compliance with these rules as Requirements Quality Engineering metrics:

  • Percentage of requirements following proper patterns
  • Number of undefined terms
  • Frequency of vague language
  • Completeness of requirement attributes

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Pitfall 1: Treating Requirements as Wishes

Problem: Writing “should” statements instead of “shall” statements Solution: Use “shall” for binding requirements, reserve “should” for goals and preferences

Pitfall 2: Copy-Paste from Previous Projects

Problem: Reusing requirements without adaptation Solution: Always validate that reused requirements apply to the current project context

Pitfall 3: Mixing Levels of Abstraction

Problem: Including implementation details in system-level requirements Solution: Apply Rule R31 – keep requirements solution-free unless there’s compelling rationale

Pitfall 4: Requirements Creep During Development

Problem: Adding requirements informally without proper change control Solution: Implement formal change control processes and ensure all requirements are documented

Verification and Validation in Requirements Quality Engineering

Well-written requirements enable effective verification and validation:

Verification Planning

  • Each requirement should have defined success criteria
  • Verification methods (test, analysis, inspection, demonstration) should be specified
  • Test procedures should map directly to requirement language

Validation Planning

  • Requirements should trace back to stakeholder needs
  • Validation scenarios should exercise complete operational threads
  • Acceptance criteria should be unambiguous

Conclusion

Requirements Quality Engineering is not accidental—it results from disciplined application of proven INCOSE principles. The 42 rules presented in this guide provide a comprehensive framework for writing requirements that truly serve their purpose: communicating stakeholder needs clearly and enabling successful system development.

These rules work together synergistically. Accuracy rules ensure basic clarity, while singularity rules enable effective management. Quantification rules support verification, while modularity rules facilitate maintenance. Master these INCOSE principles, and you’ll write requirements that project teams can actually use to build successful systems.

Remember that tools can help enforce these rules, but human judgment remains essential for understanding stakeholder intent and making appropriate trade-offs. For immediate assistance with applying these INCOSE principles, try our free Rex AI requirements writing tool at reqi.io/rex, then use this guide as your reference for understanding the underlying Requirements Quality Engineering principles, adapt it to your organization’s needs, and continuously improve your requirement-writing practice.

The investment in learning and applying these INCOSE Requirements Quality Engineering rules pays dividends throughout the system lifecycle, reducing rework, preventing misunderstandings, and ultimately delivering systems that truly meet stakeholder needs.


References

  1. INCOSE-TP-2010-006-04, “Guide to Writing Requirements,” Version 4, International Council on Systems Engineering, July 2023.
  2. INCOSE-TP-2021-002-01.1, “Needs and Requirements Manual,” International Council on Systems Engineering, 2022.
  3. ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148, “Systems and software engineering — Life cycle processes — Requirements engineering,” 2018.
  4. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, “Systems and software engineering — System life cycle processes,” 2015.

This guide serves as a practical reference for systems engineers seeking to master Requirements Quality Engineering using INCOSE principles. Keep it accessible during requirement development, and refer to it regularly to ensure your requirements meet the highest professional standards.

Share this article
Requirements

Post navigation

Previous Post: Human Factors: A Comprehensive Guide to Work Optimisation

Related Posts

Stakeholder Needs into requirements Transforming Stakeholder Needs into Requirements: Best Practices Requirements
the_letter_r_in_a_blue_square_in_the_style_of_light_cy Welcome to Reqi: Your Ultimate Requirements Management Tool Requirements
concrete block all fitting together floating in the ir to show how perfectly aligned and allocated it all is The Role of Requirement Allocation in Systems Engineering Requirements
Acceptance Criteria for User Stories: Purposes, Formats, Examples, and Best Practices Acceptance Criteria for User Stories: Purposes, Formats, Examples, and Best Practices Requirements
people meeting to discuss artefacts Requirements and Artifacts in Systems Engineering: A Comprehensive Guide Requirements
Defining Requirements Workshop The Key to Successful Projects: Capturing and Defining Requirements Requirements

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recommended Courses

Coursera Requirements Writing Course Coursera Introduction to Systems Engineering Specialization Mastering Requirements Writing on Udemy Requirements Engineering (IREB/INCOSE) on Udemy Product Development & Systems Engineering on Udemy Object Process Methodology (OPM) for MBSE on Udemy advert 1 advert 2 advert 3 advert 4

Book Releases

INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook
INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook
INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook
INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook

Recommended Reading

INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook

INCOSE Assessment Guide

MBSE Books Reviewed

Click Here

Reqi

An online requirements management tool for systems engineering to bring your teams together in one simple platform. Built for project teams, systems engineers, and asset owners.

Site Links

  • Articles
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Services
  • Home

Site Authors

  • About Reqi
  • Our Requirements framework
  • Managing safety risk
  • REX our AI-powered bot
  • Data security

Disclaimer

At Reqi, when you click on my affiliate links, I earn a small commission. Plus, you often get exclusive offers. It's a win-win! I promote products I believe in.

Copyright © 2025 Reqi.

Powered by PressBook Masonry Dark